I didn't read it all. The author makes heroes of drug dealers and criminals. In his piece on Darwin, he began by pointing out what a poor naturalist Darwin was, then gives him credit for great insight. But his argument is bogus—in 30 pages, he must have pointed out 15 times (on one occasion, twice in one sentence) that creationists believed in the immutability of species and Darwin proved them wrong. But I don't know of a single creationist these days who believes that—just immutability of kinds. So his whole argument was to disprove a belief that nobody holds anymore.