Cow — Horse — Buffalo (A Comparative Study)

Posted in Humor | 2 Comments

Illinois River from Buffalo Rock State Park

April 24, 2009

Posted in Illinois | Comments Off on Illinois River from Buffalo Rock State Park

Buffalo Rock State Park

I confess that I am the one who added this adventure to our list of 30 Things Everyone Should Do In Chicagoland. I further confess that I’m not sure why. To begin with, it’s location on the Illinois River, 60 miles or so southwest of Aurora, certainly stretches the limits of “Chicagoland.” Furthermore, it’s pretty lame adventurewise.

We were happy enough to go when my niece invited us to join her and her kids on a field trip. After a picnic lunch, we headed down the trail along the bluffs above the Illinois River toward the major feature of the park — The Effigy Tumuli.

The land was donated to the state by the Ottawa Silica Company after they’d finished mining coal and silica and leaving things pretty much of a mess. To reclaim the land, some guy named Michael Heizer designed five sculptures to look like Indian burial mounds (tumuli). Since tumuli were often in the shape of animals, Heizer picked five creatures commonly seen in the area — a water strider, a frog, a catfish, a turtle, and a snake. He brought in bulldozers and covered the area with mounds. Here’s a map. (I thought I was by the water strider, but according to this map, I was way off to the side, across a road and out of the park entirely!)

I took this pan from the top of the catfish. The snake and turtle, indistinguishable from this point, are on the left.

The adventure, as listed, requires me to walk on the tumuli, so make things official, here I am on the left eye of the catfish.

And here’s my family as seen from my perch atop the tail of the turtle.

Naturally, the snake mound looked the most like what it was supposed to be, but there was no way to capture it on film. It’s over 2,000 feet long and wrapped around a pit where silica was mined in the 1940’s.

Two more pans. This is the water strider (it’s 600 feet across), the only other tumulus that is at all identifiable, as seen from the back of the frog.

The mounds are on the bluff above the Illinois River.

It was the first hot day of the year, although there was a pleasant breeze off the river. And while I wouldn’t recommend visiting the park, even if you happen to be driving by, that doesn’t mean that we didn’t have a fine time.

Posted in Illinois | Comments Off on Buffalo Rock State Park

So Much for Art. What About Poetry?

Some writers are also poets — Edgar Allan Poe springs to mind. I’m a writer, but I’ve never managed an even-moderately good poem. (Not that I’ve spent a great deal of time trying.) I think I’ve figured out my problem.

I’m not a poet, apparently.

I fail to rhyme unerringly.

My problem is, transparently,

I’m just plain bad, inherently.

Appreciate, if you will, that I used the always-tricky rhyme scheme A/A-ish/A/A.

Posted in Humor | 1 Comment

Art for Pete’s Sake — Part Two

Let me begin by saying that I often don’t “get” art that others find admirable. I realize that this is a lack on my part. To a large degree, I have a gentle envy for people who can create and appreciate art in the same way I gently envy people who are musical. I know I’m missing out on something but I don’t know if there’s anything I can do about it. Which leads me to:

Questions About Art

  1. Is there such a thing as “art for art’s sake”?
  2. Is art appreciation an inherited ability? If I don’t appreciate art is it because I’m visually tone-deaf?
  3. Can art appreciation be learned?
  4. What is the measurement of art? Is it value to the artist or viewer? Is it worth to society? Is it the satisfaction of the creative impulse?
  5. Is “art” in the eye of the artist? What if an artist creates a work and nobody appreciates it? Is it still art?
  6. Is “art” in the eye of the viewer. If you paint a picture and I appreciate it, does that make it art? Or is it only art if a viewer “in the know” appreciates it?
  7. Is it a matter of consensus? Does a work become art when a certain number of people say it is art?
  8. Who gets to decide?
  9. Is art always intentional. Can a work of art happen by accident?
  10. Where does morality come into play? Can a work be art if it violates God’s law? For example, if the Venus statue I wrote about yesterday was a goddess, the artist violated the second commandment. Can it still be art?
  11. Where does truth come into play? Can a legitimate work of art deceive the viewer about reality? Can a legitimate work of art deceive the viewer about spiritual truth?
  12. As a Christian, are there particular styles of art that I should prefer or avoid?
  13. Can a particular work be art for one generation but not art for another?

I have my opinions on some of these questions, but on others, I really have no idea what the answer is. I’d like to know what you think.

Posted in Miscellaneous | 2 Comments